🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junta_Tuitiva
Jump to content

La Paz revolution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Junta Tuitiva)
La Paz revolution
Pedro Murillo, leader of the revolution.
DateJuly 16, 1809
LocationLa Paz, Upper Peru (modern Bolivia)
ParticipantsCriollos from La Paz
OutcomeTemporary removal of Spanish authorities and declaration of independence. Spanish rule restored by Goyeneche

The City of La Paz is located in the highlands of Upper Peru. This Area is known today as Bolivia. This area became the center of a political upheaval in 1809. In July a coalition of local elites, militia officers, and urban residents overthrew the Spanish colonial authorities and established a governing body known as the Junta Tuitiva. This movement claimed that it was not completely indepedent from the Spanish monarchy. They asserted that sovereignty had returned to the people of Upper Peru. The La Paz uprising is one of the earliest and most radical uprisings in Upper Peru. This Revolution would become part of the larger Bolivian War of Independence.[1]

Background

[edit]

La Paz is located in a region dominated by the mining industry. The biggest export was silver. This mining market would soon dry up and by the late 1700s and early 1800s mining output began to decline dramatically. This would cause widespread poverty and instability. Even though La Paz was mainly just an export town, it began to feel the effects of the downturn of the economy in the region. This is because they were dependent on supplying goods to the mining centers, transporting the silver, and the labor systems that were involved in mining economies. Due to this economic downturn the city’s merchants, mule drivers, artisans, and landowners all suffered. This would start to fuel frustration within society surrounding the economy, social stress, and anxiety. There was also chronic instability due to the relations with indigenous people in Upper Peru. This system was unstable because when the economy went down, indigenous communities became stressed which would effect the entire economy of the region. [2]

In 1808, due to his unpopularity, Charles IV was forced to abdicate the throne in Spain. This unpopularity is mainly due to Spanish losses during the Napoleonic Wars. After Charles IV abdicated the throne, his son, Ferdinand VII, took over as King of Spain in March 1808. At this point, Napoleon's armies were already entering Spain. This unstable environment allowed Napoleon to exploit them and force Ferdinand to abdicate the throne as well. This collapse of the monarchy allowed many local communities in the Spanish empire to act independently.[3][4]

One of which was the Chuquisaca Revolution, which was the earliest uprising in Upper Peru following the abdication of the Spanish Throne. On May 25, 1809, local elites, law students, and clergy members in Chuquisaca pressured the Spanish president, Ramón García Pizarro, to resign. After this resignation, the Cabildo and Audiencia gained power in Chuquisaca. This eventually led to the creation of the Chuquisaca Junta. They were not completely separatist because they still claimed loyalty to Ferdinand VII. They also insisted that people had the right to protect the royal authority from Napoleon. Due to this being the first revolution in Upper Peru, it created the climate that led to the La Paz Revolution two months later. This revolution started the trend that is seen in La Paz, where the local community believes that in the absence of the king, political authority could revert to the local community[5]. They are different, though, due to the reasons why they revolted against the government. The main reason that La Paz revolted was to give the power to the people and get it away from any sort of monarchical power. In Chuquisaca, the main reason was that they did not want Napoleon to control them.[6]

Outbreak of the Revolution

[edit]

On July 16, in the city of La Paz, as celebrations for the Virgin of Carmen were unfolding, a group of revolutionaries, led by Colonel Pedro Domingo Murillo, and other individuals besieged the city barracks and forced Governor Tadeo Davila and the Bishop of La Paz, Remigio de la Santa y Ortega, to resign. On July 16, 1809, a mestizo, Pedro Domingo Murillo, famously said that the Bolivian Revolution was igniting a lamp that nobody would be able to extinguish. Many historians agree that the beginning of the independence of South America from Spain was. Political power went to the local cabildo until the "Junta Tutelar de los Derechos del Pueblo" ("Junta keeping the Rights of the People"), headed by Murillo, was formed.[7] On July 27, the junta proclaimed colonial independence.

Similar to the Chuquisaca revolution, the La Paz revolution was a direct response to the collapse of royal authority in Spain. Cabildos, Audiencias, and local elites began asserting authority normally held by the king.[8] There were also, at the time, many other factors that caused the climate in which a revolution could happen, other than the absence of a proper monarchical authority. In this Period of time, La Paz was already going under immense economic strain, mismanagement from local officials, and anger at the colonial officials among the people in La Paz. This vacuum left by the lack of a monarchy made the locals in La Paz receptive to the idea of creating an alternative government. This created an environment in which people wanted a change in government, and the absence of the king created a perfect environment for that change. In this Period of time, La Paz was already going under immense economic strain, mismanagement from local officials, and anger at the colonial officials among the people in La Paz.[9][10] This vacuum left by the lack of a monarchy made the locals in La Paz receptive to the idea of creating an alternative government.[11] This led to a group in La Paz forming that had the goal to remove the corrupt colonial administration and create a government that was able to rule based on local interests. This group included Creole elites, lawyers, urban militia officers, and influential clergy.[12] They coordinated together and deposed the existing colonial authorities and installed their own government, named Junta Tuitiva de los Derechos del Pueblo. This name translates to Protective Junta of the Rights of the People, showing that there was not a monarch in charge, but rather the government was run by the people. They were able to take control of the government by taking control of many key urban institutions, including barracks and public buildings.[13] This is something that La Paz took from other early revolutionary movements like Chuquisaca. Taking control of barracks and public buildings was characteristic of the earliest revolutionary movements and was common for establishing a functioning junta. The control of the Barracks meant that Junta Tuitiva was able to enforce their opinions and enabled them to resist Spanish attempts to counter them.[14]

The junta was not always an equal share between each of the main ruling parties. Due to this, there were several competing factions within the Junta. One example of this is Murillo's Circle. This was the group of people surrounding Pedro Domingo Murillo after they won. This group was much more radical than other parts of the Junta Tuitiva. They believed that the Crisis of the monarchy justified broad Spanish-American autonomy, sovereignty should shift towards the people of Spanish America rather than the Spanish monarchy, and finally, they believed that the junta should take decisive military action, mobilize militias, and expand the revolution into neighboring towns. This group of people favored mobilizing the population, spreading the insurgency, and framing the movement more towards the people.[15] Another faction inside the Junuta Tuitiva was a group that was more moderate. They believed that Upper Peru should remain loyal to Ferdinand VII and that the authority of the Junta Tuitiva should only be temporary. Unlike the people in Murillo's circle, they wanted to avoid provoking large-scale royal retaliation, and that the language of the Junta should remain cautious and legalistic.[16] They did not want to completely reject the revolution, but rather they wanted it to be framed as constitutional and temporary. [17]These two factions inside the junta Tuitiva came from two different social networks. Members of the loyalist faction came from elite Creole families, militia officers, clergymen, and lawyers. People who agreed with Murillo's more radical view of how the Junta Tuitiva should operate were just people who were influenced by Enlightenment political ideas and anti-colonial sentiment fueled by local crisis. Though yes, there were many disagreements on subjects such as how far the Junta should push autonomy, whether to expand the uprising, and how to respond to the royalist threats, they still all stayed unified. There were no breakaway factions, and they stayed together.[18]

Though the Junta Tuitiva claimed they represented the people, many royalist authorities copied this and claimed that they were there for the people. At this time, Spanish Political Theory held that sovereignty ultimately rested in the nation or the people when the king could not rule. The royalist used this doctrine to justify their rule. Royalist officials claimed that they were defending the Spanish Nation against French rule. They also claimed that they were preserving the unity of the catholic people. Finally, they claimed that their rule was necessary to protect the empire from political fragmentation. They presented themselves as the legal representative of the broader Spanish people. At the same time, they portrayed the Junta Tuitiva as dangerous local factions who were trying to break the unity of Spanish America. In royalist eyes, the Junta Tuitiva would only bring about a civil war, economic collapse, and attacks on ordinary people. Because of this, they framed themselves as defenders of order, stability, and the interests of the general population. They claimed that the Junta Tuitiva was against the will of the people. They believed that the people spoke through the legitimate institutions of the monarchy, not through unauthorized juntas. They would also portray themselves as protectors of indigenous communities, and they argued that rebellion would only cause indigenous suffering. They would use narratives like these to undermine the Junta Tuitiva.[19][20][21]

Eventually, this would lead to the fall of the Junta Tuitiva, who were only , , in power for three months. The response was led by Jose Manuel de Goyneche. Goyneche would advance towards La Paz, and on the way, he was able to gain support from loyalists in the southern highlands. He was also able to gather indigenous militias.[22] When Goyeneche reached the vicinity of La Paz in late October 1809, the junta attempted limited resistance but was quickly overwhelmed. The Junta Tuitiva fell so easily due to the lack of heavy arms and manpower. They were not able to gain the support from many other regions, and the only group that may have allied with them, the Chuquisaca, had already been suppressed at this point. Also, many supports fled as soon as they realized the size of the forces that were involved. After the capture of La Paz, many of the rulers of the Junta Tuitiva were arrested and executed. Some prominent leaders who, , were executed are Pedro Domingo Murillo, Juan Basilio Catacora, and Mariano Graneros. One famous quote said by Murillo before his death is “La tea que dejo encendida nadie la podrá apagar.”[23][24]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Klein, Herbert S. (January 1968). "The Crisis of Legitimacy and the Origins of Social Revolution". Journal of Inter-American Studies. 10 (1): 102–116. doi:10.2307/165061. ISSN 0885-3118. JSTOR 165061.
  2. ^ Tandeter, Enrique (February 1991). "Crisis in Upper Peru, 1800-1805". The Hispanic American Historical Review. 71 (1): 35–71. doi:10.2307/2516422. ISSN 0018-2168. JSTOR 2516422.
  3. ^ Arnade, Charles W. (April 1960). "Political Causes". Journal of Inter-American Studies. 2 (2): 125–132. doi:10.2307/164876. ISSN 0885-3118. JSTOR 164876.
  4. ^ Davis, Harold E. (October 1951). "America's Colonial Experiment. By Julius W. Pratt. (New York: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1950. Pp. xi, 460. $6.00.)". The Americas. 8 (2): 254–255. doi:10.2307/978327. ISSN 0003-1615. JSTOR 978327.
  5. ^ Ternavasio, Marcela (2023). "José María Portillo Valdés, Una historia Atlántica de los orígenes de la Nación y el Estado. España y las Españas en el siglo XIX. Madrid, Alianza editorial, 2022". Araucaria (54): 795–799. doi:10.12795/araucaria.2023.i54.36. ISSN 1575-6823.
  6. ^ Rodríguez O., Jaime E. (1995-01-01), "LA INDEPENDENCIA DE LA AMÉRICA ESPAÑOLA", La revolución de independencia, El Colegio de México, pp. 187–236, doi:10.2307/j.ctv512sb9.13, retrieved 2025-12-06
  7. ^ Abad de Santillán, Diego (1965). "Chuquisaca y La Paz". Historia Argentina (in Spanish). Buenos Aires: TEA (Tipográfica Editora Argentina). p. 398.
  8. ^ Rodríguez O., Jaime E. (1995-01-01), "LA INDEPENDENCIA DE LA AMÉRICA ESPAÑOLA", La revolución de independencia, El Colegio de México, pp. 187–236, doi:10.2307/j.ctv512sb9.13, retrieved 2025-12-06
  9. ^ Tandeter, Enrique (February 1991). "Crisis in Upper Peru, 1800-1805". The Hispanic American Historical Review. 71 (1): 35–71. doi:10.2307/2516422. ISSN 0018-2168. JSTOR 2516422.
  10. ^ Nava, Julian; Lieuwen, Edwin (February 1963). "Venezuela". The Hispanic American Historical Review. 43 (1): 135. doi:10.2307/2510457. ISSN 0018-2168. JSTOR 2510457.
  11. ^ Arnade, Charles W. (April 1960). "Political Causes". Journal of Inter-American Studies. 2 (2): 125–132. doi:10.2307/164876. ISSN 0885-3118. JSTOR 164876.
  12. ^ Klein, Herbert S. (January 1968). "The Crisis of Legitimacy and the Origins of Social Revolution". Journal of Inter-American Studies. 10 (1): 102–116. doi:10.2307/165061. ISSN 0885-3118. JSTOR 165061.
  13. ^ Klein, Herbert S. (January 1968). "The Crisis of Legitimacy and the Origins of Social Revolution". Journal of Inter-American Studies. 10 (1): 102–116. doi:10.2307/165061. ISSN 0885-3118. JSTOR 165061.
  14. ^ Klein, Herbert S. (January 1968). "The Crisis of Legitimacy and the Origins of Social Revolution". Journal of Inter-American Studies. 10 (1): 102–116. doi:10.2307/165061. ISSN 0885-3118. JSTOR 165061.
  15. ^ Rodríguez O., Jaime E. (1995-01-01), "LA INDEPENDENCIA DE LA AMÉRICA ESPAÑOLA", La revolución de independencia, El Colegio de México, pp. 187–236, doi:10.2307/j.ctv512sb9.13, retrieved 2025-12-06
  16. ^ Rodríguez O., Jaime E. (1995-01-01), "LA INDEPENDENCIA DE LA AMÉRICA ESPAÑOLA", La revolución de independencia, El Colegio de México, pp. 187–236, doi:10.2307/j.ctv512sb9.13, retrieved 2025-12-06
  17. ^ Rodríguez O., Jaime E. (1995-01-01), "LA INDEPENDENCIA DE LA AMÉRICA ESPAÑOLA", La revolución de independencia, El Colegio de México, pp. 187–236, doi:10.2307/j.ctv512sb9.13, retrieved 2025-12-06
  18. ^ Rodríguez O., Jaime E. (1995-01-01), "LA INDEPENDENCIA DE LA AMÉRICA ESPAÑOLA", La revolución de independencia, El Colegio de México, pp. 187–236, doi:10.2307/j.ctv512sb9.13, retrieved 2025-12-06
  19. ^ "El trono vacío. La imaginación política y la crisis constitucional de la Monarquía Hispánica", Relatos de Nación, Vervuert Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 23–50, 2005-12-31, doi:10.31819/9783964565501-003, ISBN 978-3-96456-550-1, retrieved 2025-12-06
  20. ^ Rodríguez O., Jaime E. (1995-01-01), "LA INDEPENDENCIA DE LA AMÉRICA ESPAÑOLA", La revolución de independencia, El Colegio de México, pp. 187–236, doi:10.2307/j.ctv512sb9.13, retrieved 2025-12-06
  21. ^ "LAS volume 11 issue 1 Cover and Front matter". Journal of Latin American Studies. 11 (1): f1 – f2. May 1979. doi:10.1017/s0022216x00022252. ISSN 0022-216X.
  22. ^ "Contributors". Hispanic American Historical Review. 81 (3–4): v–vi. 2001-08-01. doi:10.1215/00182168-81-3-4-v. ISSN 0018-2168.
  23. ^ Rodríguez O., Jaime E. (1995-01-01), "LA INDEPENDENCIA DE LA AMÉRICA ESPAÑOLA", La revolución de independencia, El Colegio de México, pp. 187–236, doi:10.2307/j.ctv512sb9.13, retrieved 2025-12-06
  24. ^ Klein, Herbert S. (January 1968). "The Crisis of Legitimacy and the Origins of Social Revolution". Journal of Inter-American Studies. 10 (1): 102–116. doi:10.2307/165061. ISSN 0885-3118. JSTOR 165061.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=La_Paz_revolution&oldid=1326116047"