Talk:National Gathering (Serbia)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 17:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 19:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Discussion

All the images have acceptable copyright and all of them are captioned. History6042 (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

You are really the only editor contributing to this page. You can't edit war yourself so that is good. History6042 (talk) 19:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

The article isn't really supportive of the party or clearly against it. History6042 (talk) 19:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

The article follows MoS and flows well. It also covers all major points and isn't unfocused. History6042 (talk) 19:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Every statement that needs an inline citation has one. History6042 (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Earwig found nothing wrong with the article for copyright violations. History6042 (talk) 19:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

All the first ten sources seem reliable. History6042 (talk) 19:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Same with sources 11 through 20. History6042 (talk) 19:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Source 2 is correct. History6042 (talk) 14:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Source 3 is good as well. History6042 (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Same with 4, 5, and 6. History6042 (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

7 is good. History6042 (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

So is 8. I think I have checked enough for a source spot check. I am going to pass this, good job. History6042 (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.