Talk:National Gathering (Serbia): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
ChristieBot (talk | contribs) m Transcluding GA review |
History6042 (talk | contribs) promote National Gathering (Serbia) to good article (GANReviewTool) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|17:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Vacant0|<span style="color:#5E9A4A;font-weight:bold">Vacant</span><span style="color:#A24B4B;font-weight:bold">0</span>]] <span style="font-size:small">([[User talk:Vacant0|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Vacant0|contribs]])</span>|page=1|subtopic=Politics and government|status=onreview|note=|shortdesc=Political coalition in Serbia}} |
|||
{{Skip to talk}} |
{{Skip to talk}} |
||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
{{British English}} |
{{British English}} |
||
{{GA|14:52, 8 December 2024 (UTC)|topic=Social sciences and society|page=1|oldid=1257199418}} |
|||
{{WikiProject banner shell |class= |
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=GA |1= |
||
{{WikiProject Serbia|importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Serbia|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=Low |political-parties=yes |political-parties-importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Politics |importance=Low |political-parties=yes |political-parties-importance=low}} |
||
Revision as of 14:52, 8 December 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the National Gathering (Serbia) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| National Gathering (Serbia) has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 8, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:National Gathering (Serbia)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 17:27, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 19:25, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Criteria
| GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
|---|
|
|
Overall: |
Discussion
All the images have acceptable copyright and all of them are captioned. History6042 (talk) 19:28, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- You are really the only editor contributing to this page. You can't edit war yourself so that is good. History6042 (talk) 19:29, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article isn't really supportive of the party or clearly against it. History6042 (talk) 19:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article follows MoS and flows well. It also covers all major points and isn't unfocused. History6042 (talk) 19:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Every statement that needs an inline citation has one. History6042 (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Earwig found nothing wrong with the article for copyright violations. History6042 (talk) 19:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- All the first ten sources seem reliable. History6042 (talk) 19:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Same with sources 11 through 20. History6042 (talk) 19:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Source 2 is correct. History6042 (talk) 14:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Source 3 is good as well. History6042 (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Same with 4, 5, and 6. History6042 (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- 7 is good. History6042 (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- So is 8. I think I have checked enough for a source spot check. I am going to pass this, good job. History6042 (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- 7 is good. History6042 (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Same with 4, 5, and 6. History6042 (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Source 3 is good as well. History6042 (talk) 14:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Source 2 is correct. History6042 (talk) 14:41, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Same with sources 11 through 20. History6042 (talk) 19:55, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- All the first ten sources seem reliable. History6042 (talk) 19:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Earwig found nothing wrong with the article for copyright violations. History6042 (talk) 19:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Every statement that needs an inline citation has one. History6042 (talk) 19:43, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article follows MoS and flows well. It also covers all major points and isn't unfocused. History6042 (talk) 19:37, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- The article isn't really supportive of the party or clearly against it. History6042 (talk) 19:32, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Social sciences and society good articles
- GA-Class Serbia articles
- Low-importance Serbia articles
- WikiProject Serbia articles
- GA-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- GA-Class political party articles
- Low-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- GA-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
