Talk:The Hungry Five/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 20:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 12:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I will do this review. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:57, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I fixed all grammar mistakes myself. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:05, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Earwig found no major issues. There are inline citations that are used correctly. 1, 3, 5, 7, 10 (I don't have access to 9 but will assume good faith), and 11 all pass the spotcheck. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:59, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article mentions all of the Hungry Five and explains how they helped the Packers. It isn't too detailed. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:13, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article is pretty neutral but there are a few issues such as "and even loaning" should not have the "even" as that makes it seem like it is an unreasonable thing to do and he is such an amazing person for it. Fixed History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   There are no edit wars. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Every image is public domain. All images have captions and alt text, there are enough of them, and they are all relevant. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:13, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

@Gonzo fan2007, good job, I can pass this, also I have nominated Tiny Croft to GA status, please take a look if you have time. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:06, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

1. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

All images have captions and alt text, there are enough of them. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Every image is public domain. There are no edit wars. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:59, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

The article is pretty neutral but there are a few issues such as "and even loaning" should not have the "even" as that makes it seem like it is an unreasonable thing to do and he is such an amazing person for it. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

History6042, I have removed "even". Is there a way you could use a different GA template? Assuming you have more comments, it makes it really difficult to respond inline when this template is used. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:55, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

 Done, @Gonzo fan2007. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:14, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

I will now do a spotcheck for sources. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:24, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

I will check every other source. History6042😊 (Contact me) 13:26, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

1, 3, 5, 7, 10 (I don't have access to 9 but will assume good faith), and 11 all pass the spotcheck. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:58, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

I fixed all grammar mistakes myself. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:04, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.