🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Diff/1314454042
Jump to content

Talk:Punggol LRT line: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Transcluding GA review
placed Punggol LRT line GAN nomination on hold (GANReviewTool)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{GA nominee|07:38, 30 May 2025 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:ZKang123|ZKang123]] ([[User talk:ZKang123|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/ZKang123|contribs]])|page=1|subtopic=Transport|status=onreview|note=|shortdesc=Light rail line in Singapore}}
{{GA nominee|07:38, 30 May 2025 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:ZKang123|ZKang123]] ([[User talk:ZKang123|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/ZKang123|contribs]])|page=1|subtopic=Transport|status=onhold|note=|shortdesc=Light rail line in Singapore}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
{{WikiProject Trains|Mapneeded=yes|Subway=yes|importance=low|unref=yes}}
{{WikiProject Trains|Mapneeded=yes|Subway=yes|importance=low|unref=yes}}

Revision as of 14:13, 1 October 2025

Huh?

The picture on the bottom shows NE16/STC Sengkang and not NE17/PTC Punggol. --116.14.34.220 (talk) 05:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a photo of Punggol station. The filename is wrong. - oahiyeel talk 12:52, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Punggol LRT Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sengkang LRT Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:29, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sengkang LRT line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:46, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Punggol LRT line/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 07:38, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Icepinner (talk · contribs) 00:00, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Reviewing this as part of backlog drive. Possibly the first review where I have to spot-check and handful of sources and AGF for the others. Icepinner 00:00, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ZKang123: I have finished this review. Surprised by how it's mostly minor issues, possibly cause most of the issues were already resolved on SKLRT's GAN review. Anyways, placing this review on hold. Icepinner 14:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Some changes were made but weren't indicated here. I also made some copyedits. Anyways, passing review. Icepinner 10:15, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Lead

History

Network and operations

Infrastructure

Images

Source review

Did most of the above changes. Thanks for the review.--ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 06:10, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.