Related changes
Appearance
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
11 December 2025
- diffhist Ordinal number 10:34 −131 Tosiaki! talk contribs (→Order types: Shortening the conclusion)
- diffhist Ordinal number 10:31 +1,369 Tosiaki! talk contribs (→Von Neumann definition of ordinals: Moving definition variations to the top)
- diffhist Ordinal number 10:22 +2,024 Tosiaki! talk contribs (→Order types and definition variations: expanding on the order types)
- diffhist m Ordinal number 09:40 −121 Tosiaki! talk contribs (→Transfinite sequence: switching to the more common definition)
- diffhist Ordinal number 09:39 +1,893 Tosiaki! talk contribs (Adding notes on normal sequences)
- diffhist m Ordinal number 09:25 −2 Tosiaki! talk contribs (→Successor and limit ordinals)
- diffhist Ordinal number 09:24 +1,563 Tosiaki! talk contribs (→Successor and limit ordinals: adding additional notes and references for definition of limit ordinals)
- diffhist Ordinal number 09:15 −145 Tosiaki! talk contribs (Placing the successor and limit ordinals earlier, distributing some content into other sections)
- diffhist Ordinal number 08:40 −27 Tosiaki! talk contribs (→Basic properties: Merging these two parts to emphasize the only important fact)
- diffhist Ordinal number 08:33 −13,292 Tosiaki! talk contribs (→Von Neumann definition of ordinals: abbreviating section)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics 04:09 −1,076 Scsbot talk contribs (edited by robot: archiving November 26)
- diffhist Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics 00:05 0 Scsbot talk contribs (edited by robot: adding date header(s))
10 December 2025
- diffhist Ordinal number 20:55 +24 Americanastronaut talk contribs (IMO describing this property as "proper subsets are elements" is incredibly misleading/confusing for a casual reader, who is likely to interpret it literally as saying that an arbitrary proper subset of an ordinal must also be an element of that ordinal. In my experience teaching, this kind of elementary confusion is extremely common and great pains should be taken to avoid it whenever possible.)