Talk:Artificial structures visible from space
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 May 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Artificial borders
[edit]While maybe "The naked eye can tell the difference between cities and countryside from space", the border between them is often hard to discern. For a clearly artificial border region of differing land use there's the boundary of New Zealand's Egmont National Park. (Bonus points: spot the urban regions.)
Baray Lakes
[edit]I removed Isenberg's (poorly-worded) factoid of the Baray Lakes at Angkor Wat being somehow visible from outer space without a source and without listing/linking the International Space Station (he used "ISS" only).
His unsourced and poorly-worded thingamajig was on the article for almost a year. 9mm.trilla (talk) 16:41, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Dear 9mm.trilla, there is no such thing as poor-worded on a Wiki as everyone who makes that judging expression could have already fixed it themselves. A reference is given, visible in the wide angle image used on the same page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_structures_visible_from_space#/media/File:ISS070-E-071793.jpg . Isenberg (talk) 01:43, 1 August 2025 (UTC)
- Dear 9mm.trilla, please review the wording of my new addition. If it doesn't match your expectations in wording, just fix it. Isenberg (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
- I removed ita s it was unsourced. See WP:VERIFY. Doug Weller talk 07:07, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
