🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Data_communication
Jump to content

Talk:Data communication

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Telecommunications

[edit]

Telecommunications is a subset of data communications. There is no need to mention tele-communcations in the first paragraph.

Possibly but some may argue that telecommunications span a distance and some of the communications discussed in this article are local. ~Kvng (talk) 14:18, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Data in transit into Data communication

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Neologism. fgnievinski (talk) 20:42, 17 March 2025 (UTC) fgnievinski (talk) 20:42, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Fgnievinski, aan you elaborate on your WP:NEO assertion? These articles have citations and a quick search shows evidence of use of the terms in sources. ~Kvng (talk) 23:02, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Related discussion: Talk:Computer_data_storage#Proposed_merge_of_Data_at_rest_into_Computer_data_storage. fgnievinski (talk) 05:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed merge of Data at rest into Computer data storage

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Talk:Computer data storage#Proposed merge of Data at rest into Computer data storage. Fgnievinski 154.222.6.135 (talk) 05:42, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I refactored the above comment to provide workable links and what looked like an attempt to ping a user. Johnuniq (talk) 07:00, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I refactored it so much that I will repeat the ping because the first probably did not work. Sorry Fgnievinski if you get this twice. Johnuniq (talk) 07:01, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.