🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cleebadee
Jump to content

User talk:Cleebadee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:Cleebadee)

January 2019

[edit]
Hello, Caleb the 1st, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Caleb the 1st, good luck, and have fun. 7&6=thirteen () 21:26, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion

[edit]

You might want to gravitate to Wikipedia:Kindness Campaign. I appreciate your thanks. 7&6=thirteen () 21:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I second. Thanks for the thanks. AceTankCommander (talk) 21:10, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Caleb the 1st, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Caleb the 1st! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Cleebadee! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:21, Sunday, May 10, 2020 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 10:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar correction at Yolanda Saldivar

[edit]

Hi! I found it necessary to revert your recent grammar correction in this article because, though the correction was fine, the bad grammar had been in an edit made by an IP editor. The article is under pending changes protection. I am a pending changes patroller, one of the many editors with the minor ability to accept or revert edits made to protected articles by editors who do not have at least ten edits and three days as a registered editor. This is a rarely used form of protection; it is designed to prevent disruptive edits on select articles.

I apologize for reverting your edit; I think that was the only way I could revert the non-conforming edit by the IP (if the edit had added a new, verifiable source, I would have approved it.

Your edit to the article also was pended since you do not have the pending protection patroller right yet.

Thank you for contributing to the world's largest encyclopedia. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 23:55, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I hadn't realized the info wasn't backed up yet. Someone else attached a source to the information, so it looks like it's good now. Cleebadee (talk) 00:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:06, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]