🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Dat_GuyWiki
Jump to content

User talk:DatGuy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User:Dat GuyWiki)



ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]
Hey, DatGuy. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 13:09, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring noticeboard

[edit]

Hello! I'm having issues with a certain user on the edit-warring noticeboard. After violating the three-revert rule (despite being warned to stop edit-warring), they proceeded to revert one of my own edits (a diff I posted as evidence of disruption) on the noticeboard. From what I understand, Wikipedia users are never supposed to revert or edit other users' edits on talk pages or noticeboards—even typos. And that user is now still litigating content issues[1] six hours after your warning[2] to stop. Israell (talk) 02:41, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And this is? Come on. DatGuyTalkContribs 03:48, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I only replied because they made a false assertion about what I typed elsewhere, which is not fair to me, but I am no longer replying to them (I did not reply to their latest reply). I'll no longer engage with them. Israell (talk) 03:57, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]