User talk:Retired77777777777777

Welcome!

Hi Part-Timer789! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Archer1234 (t·c) 13:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rajinikanth filmography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Per WP:FILMOGRAPHY, we do not add future film projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source.

— Archer1234 (t·c) 13:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rajinikanth's 171th film is Coolie. I added it on basis of the title teaser which was released yesterday. If the filming hasn't begun then I think it is fine that is removed. Part-Timer789 (talk) 06:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Charliehdb. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of highest-grossing Telugu films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Charliehdb (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your contributions to article List of highest-grossing South Indian films did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Sacnilk source or any news media using Sacnilk source and the claims made by the film's own production company are unreliable. Source needs to be secondary independent. RangersRus (talk) 14:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These sources have also been in highest grossing Indian films and highest grossing Telugu films wikipedia pages which I have added here. Why are the rules different here? Part-Timer789 (talk) 14:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rules are not different. The indian express source with claims from production companies were removed from the film's main page and the list of highest gross indian films. Not everyone is familiar with secondary independent sources and can make mistakes. Please use secondary independent sources like the one on the film's main page. RangersRus (talk) 14:38, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:20, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Rafael Nadal, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 04:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rafael Nadal

He's still active until after the Davis Cup in November. Please do not change players' statuses prematurely. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 15:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rana Daggubati filmography, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of highest-grossing Telugu films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Refer to WP:ICTFSOURCES for reliable sources used in film related articles. Reports coming from Sacnilk and the makers in the source, are not reliable sources. RangersRus (talk) 08:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Hello, I'm Trailblazer101. I noticed that you recently removed content from Deadpool & Wolverine without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, I'm Betty Logan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of highest-grossing films, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Betty Logan (talk) 13:24, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2022 Men's T20 World Cup statistics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 Men's T20 World Cup statistics, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 World Twenty20 records and statistics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Anti-Palestinianism during the Gaza war, you may be blocked from editing. Lova Falk (talk) 07:24, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of highest-grossing horror films. You added a ticket sales figure to a table with a "citation needed" template on that figure. If you don't have any kind of source for a figure that you're adding, don't add it. Belbury (talk) 13:00, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was added in highest grossing box office admissions page. There is no need for source. Retired77777777777777 (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there no need for a source? Belbury (talk) 16:54, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

July 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Rama. Wikipedia is based on reliable and verifiable sources only! There are multiple warnings on your talk page; please be careful. Ekdalian (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hello. Several times in the last couple of days I've had to move citations after you've edited pages and left them in the wrong place. For instance just now on the Wimbledon men's singles final page you left the citation for last year's final at the end of the sentence you wrote with this year's result. When editing articles please move existing citations to appropriate places and ideally also add new citations for the content you are adding. Best wishes. Shrug02 (talk) 19:07, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was unaware of placing citations in appropriate places. Thanks for reminding me of same. Retired77777777777777 (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mahavatar narsimha

Requesting you to change mahavatar narasimha box office collection in the its main page as well. 120.61.224.36 (talk) 07:05, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot edit that page. Retired77777777777777 (talk) 07:11, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of Indian films of 2025. Sacnilk is not a reliable source per WP:ICTFSOURCES. Epicion (talk) 07:47, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not vandalizing Wikipedia. I wasn't aware that is Sacnilk is not reliable source. Thanks for providing the link reliable source link. Retired77777777777777 (talk) 09:09, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Toxic: A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups. Charliehdb (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Without exception of one actor none of the actors added with source. Retired77777777777777 (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Newwz and Taare Zameen Par franchise

Hi Retired77777777777777, I posted the below para in of the highest grossing Indian films article. Could please edit it? Read the following para Aryanverma2077 (talk) 14:05, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Which para? Could specify the article. Retired77777777777777 (talk) 17:52, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

this one i thought I copied it

With the estimate gross of 434 Cr of Newwz(Good Newwz and Bad Newwz) franchise and 364 Cr of Taare Zameen Par franchise, it should be in the list.(Both in top 25). Also currently there are 29 franchises in the list instead we should have 25 franchises, to keep it like the other similar articles. Aryanverma2077 (talk) 18:20, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There aren not part of any franchises. Both Bad Newwz and Sitaare Zameen Par are spiritually sequels to Good Newwz and TZP and not actual sequels. They cannot be considered as franchises. Retired77777777777777 (talk) 08:32, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

so by the same way we could say this about OMG, Baaghi, Housefull, Golmaal. All of them are anthology film series or franchise. Even like half of the film series of India are just fill with anthalogies. Aryanverma2077 (talk) 08:52, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changing numbers and statistics with zero reasons in edit summary

I have noticed that you have been changing statistics on large numbers of articles without any reasons given in edit summaries or any sources. It certainly looks like you are just vandalizing articles. You need to start providing edit summaries that explain any such changes or the assumption will be that your account is only being used for vandalism Mfield (Oi!) 05:33, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Once more, you need to start leaving edit summaries for every edit you make, you are continuing to make large numbers of changes with no explanation. All you need to do is say "Updating totals from xyx" If you continue to do so you will be blocked from editing as it leaves other editors with no idea what is happening. Mfield (Oi!) 06:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why is that necessary? A lot of edits are made without edit summaries. Retired77777777777777 (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Edit_summary, the opening paragraph "According to the policy on consensus, all edits should be explained (unless the reason for them is obvious)—either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page. It is a good practice to provide a meaningful summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors or deleting existing text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit. In appropriate circumstances, a summary can be quite brief" Mfield (Oi!) 16:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm chiming in with Mfield. You've been asked before to provide explanations for your edits--never mind reliable secondary sources. It is not hard to do. Drmies (talk) 16:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is not hard for me to add edit summary when I using PC. But it is when I am using mobile. Retired77777777777777 (talk) 17:56, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not the point, and it's not hard on mobile either. I do it all the time. Drmies (talk) 20:06, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The history of this article you have edited extensively is a great example... https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_highest-grossing_fantasy_films&action=history Looking at that page history it is incredibly difficult to follow what was changed, when and why, especially this is the case if you are changing statistics without referencing where the updated information has come from. Now take another page history at random [1] and you can see what it should look like. Mfield (Oi!) 16:29, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from box office update (daily or weekly), I don't much changes highest grossing film articles. Even if I do like adding new movies I mention it in edit summary. Now I am adding edit summaries for box office update as well. Retired77777777777777 (talk) 17:53, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2025 Women's Cricket World Cup

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 Women's Cricket World Cup, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:20, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]