User talk:SuperFastSpellChecker

Welcome!

Hi SuperFastSpellChecker! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 16:27, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, LuniZunie. SuperFastSpellChecker (talk) 22:16, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello, I'm ScrabbleTiles. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Department of Homeland Security v. MacLean, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 15:31, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You sniped me seconds after starting my edit while I was preparing a further edit to add the context to the quote from the SCOTUS ruling. I think you could have waited a minute. May I restore the quote with the context? SuperFastSpellChecker (talk) 15:35, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The fact there was no context was not the reason I reverted it. I reverted it was because there was not a citation. If you could link to where you got that information from, then it would be verifiable. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 16:10, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Restored your edit

Hi,

I have restored your edits here. My edit summary was not directed towards you, but the editor before you who was simply playing around with the categories. You kinda got caught in the reversion, and that was not my intention. Plasticwonder (talk) 23:07, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response, that makes more sense now. SuperFastSpellChecker (talk) 12:17, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you!

Many thanks for coming on Saturday: I hope you had a good time and picked up some useful information about Wikipedia and its community! Here's a few bits I promised to update you on:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (WP:AFD) is a useful place to find articles which may be sourceable and "rescue-able". Even looking for sources, finding none, and recommending to delete is valuable, especially in deletion discussions which aren't seeing much activity. AFDs are sorted into broad categories: I keep an eye on Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/England and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Architecture, for example.
We were discussing Notability (WP:N): the full guideline can be found at Wikipedia:Notability, with guidelines for specific topics at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines. Guidance can change over time through discussion and the development of new consensus: a recent tightening of the rules around the notability of footballers comes to mind. Worth a detailed read.
Templates are useful and powerful. Help:A quick guide to templates is a how-to guide with lots of links. Anything between double curly brackets is a template. One of the most commonly used is the "reply to" (also known as "ping") template, when you want to alert another user to a discussion. For example, if you were discussing something on a Talk page and wanted to get my opinion, you could type {{ping|Hassocks5489}} and I would receive an alert in the form of a little red number next to my username, which when I clicked on it would show a link to the page in question and the discussion. Multiple users can be pinged, and the template parameters can be customised: for example, I can use it to say that HJ Mitchell, SilkTork, Thryduulf, and Mike Peel were with us on Saturday. Go to the edit window to see how I did it.
Much can be learned from browsing randomly through discussions on Noticeboards, although you may find out quickly why some of them are known as "drama boards"...! Wikipedia:Noticeboards has a navigation template ("navbox") at the bottom with links to all the main ones.
This lovely navbox (actually a Template, technically!) has all the Brighton- and Hove-related content you could imagine. Here's another ... and there's a few tempting redlinks!

Do feel free to "ping" any of us with questions at any time: we'll be happy to help. Hope to see you at a future meetup: the next one in Brighton is likely to be early March, and will be advertised in advance. We occasionally go "on tour" to other nearby destinations: a summer meetup in Eastbourne has been discussed for next year. Cheers, Matt (Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 10:41, 1 December 2025 (UTC))[reply]

I'm surprised that The Evening Star (or Evening Star) is neither an article nor even a redlink on the Brighton and Hove buildings template. As the original home of Skinners Brewery (which became Dark Star after Rob Jones moved from Pitfield Brewery in London, taking his CAMRA Supreme Champion Beer (1987 - the first Supreme Champion won by a modern (20th century) brewery) Dark Star with him), and being listed by The Telegraph as one of the best pubs in England, it is certainly notable enough to have its own Wikipedia article. I'm sure, SuperFastSpellChecker, that you and Hassocks could cobble together something decent. SilkTork (talk) 15:37, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for these, very useful. I'll give some thought to the content suggestions but frankly I think I'm a long way from that kind of contribution right now (although as discussed reviving an article destined for deletion might be one way to get some practice).

It was great meeting you all. I hope to make the next one, I'll keep an eye on the Brighton meetup page.

Cheers!

Steve.

SuperFastSpellChecker (talk) 21:21, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]