Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3dgd360

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

3dgd360

A rendering engine (the author assumes we know what that is) written up by its developer. No evidence of notability. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 08:15, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is this legitimate grounds to delete this article? Perhaps specialists may value it. Artene50 (talk) 08:49, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is, under WP:N. In other words, material should only appear on Wikipedia if there are independent, third party reliable sources who have commented on it--and those sources are quoted in the article. You see, if we didn't have that policy, then Wikipedia would become a useless quagmire of articles on everyone's little backyard projects and rapidly bog down. (Obviously, this comment is a vote to delete.)--S Marshall (talk) 11:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment i let people who used 3dgd360 already ( beta testers ) put comments on the page. I guess they are third party and i guess there is no more reason to delete the article anymore. Thanks ~phpboxxx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.128.0.230 (talk) 21:16, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are so few ghits that it was possible to scan them all, and I saw nothing usable as a reliable source. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment At least thats honest. Fact is, there are a lot more users, they will comment as well, give it some time please. On the other hand i can figure out easily that my article is going to be deleted as is. I accept this fact; but theres one thing left to say. As soon as one of my projects is a success i will create an article on wikipedia about it. ~phpboxxx
Comment OK. I dont know what to say now, the user RHaworth just undoed the latest change... and removed the comment a user of my project ( its not a dupe account, actually it was from a beta tester of my project ). Anyways you can see it in the change history so what... ~phpboxxx
- It sounds like you may need to re-read WP:NOT and WP:OWN. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:53, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a rendering engine coded entirely in PHP? That's pretty cool. But with no reliable sources, notability is not established. -- Whpq (talk) 14:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- definitely a topic of note if verified but without independent third party sources verification is impossible.Nrswanson (talk) 06:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.