Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Access Advance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Additionally, the article has WP:COPYVIO problems, with very close paraphrasing of the following sources: 1, 2 and 3. As such, this article should not be WP:REFUNDED. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Access Advance

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Brochure article/advertisement. Refs are press-releases, PR, routine annoucements. scope_creep^Talk 09:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Massachusetts. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The first line nearly killed me. Fails WP:ORG Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Good grief; I wager the text runs right out of the corporate counsel's office. Very long on press releases, very short on reliable sources providing independent coverage. Article all too dependent on SPAs [1] [2] whose neutrality are certainly in question. Ravenswing 16:24, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yes, the advertisement tone is a real problem (I read this... I was groaning on the inside) and it also lacks enough citations. Although I may have high standards how many citations an article should have you cannot avoid the fact that it is missing some. 𝙷𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚑𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚝 👋❤️ (𝚃𝚊𝚕𝚔🤔) 23:54, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It's a great press-release, but an ugly wikipedia article. --Bash7oven (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.