Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anglo-Utahn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anglo-Utahn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a neologism not covered by reliable secondary sources. The only Google hits are Wikipedia mirrors and the comments of people who noticed the Wikipedia article. Ntsimp (talk) 08:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. —Ntsimp (talk) 08:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this invented neologism. The lone source in the article neither mentions "anglo-utahn"'s nor supports the claim being sourced. Total lack of secondary coverage of the topic. Possibly made up. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 09:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above. Aeonx (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. GreenGlass^(talk) 01:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no coverage in reliable sources. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone. Roscelese (talk) 05:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.