Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurec Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:20, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aurec Group

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company has almost zero notability outside it's very small telecom niche. Articles provided do not establish significant coverage or notability as required by WP:GNG Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 22:29, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 04:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep article is sourced and is noteworthy and informative. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 04:42, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep What Sir Joseph said.--Geewhiz (talk) 11:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep May not be the best-written article on Wikipedia, but even a very quick WP:BEFORE would have established notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per previous comments. As well, there are enough referencs in Hebrew about complany. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 18:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.