Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Balint
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 12:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Benjamin Balint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
does not meet notability guidelines, self-promotional content Blueeyesisr (talk) 16:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC) — Blueeyesisr (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article is not promotional in tone and has a large number of reliable sources listed. Edward321 (talk) 23:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The large number of reliable sources appear to be articles written by Balint. Not about or independent of Balint. No real claim to notability shown. Just a writer doing his job (the publication list suggests doing it well but that does not make him notable). Duffbeerforme (talk) 17:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Every one of those so-called reliable sources is written by the subject, not about him. I wish people would actually look at claimed sources rather than get dazzled by their quantity. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Duffbeerforme. Offered links are not reliable sources independent of the subject. Notability not established. لennavecia 15:59, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.