Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blank Noize
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 07:09, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Blank Noize (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Likely non-notable band. Tried to give benefit of doubt with a simple {{notability}} but an anon twice removed this without comment or alteration. tomasz. 18:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 20:44, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can not find anything to help the article satisfy WP:MUSIC notability. [1] and [2], [3]. Most of it is just forums, official site, listings etc..etc..lyrics. Wisdom89 (T / C) 02:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Black Kite 08:52, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is a perfectly good attempt at an establishment of notability in the lead section. However I find the claims to be highly questionable without verifiable and reliable sources. Otherwise, seems to be a failure of WP:MUSIC. -Verdatum (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 22:20, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.