Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boubaker polynomials
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. east.718 at 03:49, 11/13/2007
- Boubaker polynomials (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Apparentlty, autopromotion from the creator. Only a subject in one thesis, not notable. Barraki 18:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How did you conclude that the creator is Boubaker? The main problem with the article seems to be that it doesn't say what Boubaker polynomials are. (It also doesn't explain what "registered" means.) Michael Hardy 19:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- [1] (Mmbmmmbm is the creator of the article) Barraki 19:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not enough data to judge notability. The article doesn't actually explain what the subject is, but merely notes from where the subject was derived. The WP:COI concerns, noted by the nom, are problematic as well, and hint at a possible violation of WP:ADVERT as self-promotion. ZZ Claims ~ Evidence 21:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No mathematical notability. MathSciNet has 29 hits to "boubaker", but they're all papers by other people with similar names (primarily Boubaker-Khaled Sadallah); none are by K. Boubaker nor about anything named after him. Google scholar had too many Boubakers to look at all of them, but doesn't find anything about the polynomials. —David Eppstein 02:15, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Not to Delete. ; the references are true 02:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.203.50.144 (talk)
- Rem: this IP added a picture which is a sceenshot from Word uploaded by Mmbmmmbm. I assume the IP is Mmbmmmbm. Anyway, neither of them has other contributions than these. Anyway, he could at least use text and TeX instead of pictures. Barraki 17:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.