Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Companions of Jesus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Faithful Companions of Jesus Cheers, I'^mperator 16:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Companions of Jesus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is not clear how this subect meets the notability criteria, and I wasn't able to find independent sources to confirm this organization's notability. In addition, the article is written in a distinctly promotional tone, and appears to be written by someone with a conflict of interest. Recreated by original creator after {prod} deletion. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Jack Merridew 12:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Alternatively, Redirect to Faithful Companions of Jesus which is a notable organization of women. News searches of this phrase either turn up the FCJ, or an acting troupe in New Mexico, but I found no mention of the "servant companions of Jesus". Mandsford (talk) 13:14, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Mansford. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 14:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Google will give plenty of false positives, and even with the specification, "Bexhill-on-Sea," most of the handful of ghits are false positives too. Non-notable organization. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:23, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, agree with User:Blanchardb. I first wondered whether this was a hoax ("inter-denominatonal community of Franciscans"?) but it appears to exist, albeit it has not yet received the sort of coverage needed for notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.