Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conrad Electronic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. L Faraone 00:12, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad Electronic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This UK branch of a larger company does not seem to be notable in itself and there is no assertion of notability. The article is also very, very, very boring, but that is incidental. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:02, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Theopolisme (talk) 00:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's so boring, nobody can even be bothered to comment on whether it should be deleted! Philafrenzy (talk) 00:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The main branch seems notable although most of the sources are in German; suggest a rename along the lines of the German Wikipedia article. Praemonitus (talk) 04:16, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but repurpose inot an article on the whole European group. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 11:54, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Repurpose as Peterkingiron suggested. The firm as a whole is probably notable. ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (NYPL) (talk • contribs) 18:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.