Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ContactDB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:19, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ContactDB

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't really see anything that makes this company notable. The article is vaguely promotional in tone and I can't find any substantial coverage of the company. Ducknish (talk) 20:32, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:44, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:38, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The two references that the article currently provides never mention ContactDB and Google News found one mention here. It's not surprising that I found few results, considering that they are a mailing list company and this line of work wouldn't receive any significant news coverage or sources. To help broaden my Google News search, I added "Callbox" and "2004" but failed to find additional sources. Additionally, the article reads like an advertisement, focusing with promotional and unreferenced statements such as "The company is known to provide targeted contact databases" (known by who?). SwisterTwister talk 03:48, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.