Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crackelacking
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:30, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Crackelacking (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
No relible sources. Fails WP:A. Even if sourced, it fails to assert how the subject meets WP:NOTE, and isn't simply neologism. GoodnightmushTalk 02:19, 23 May 2007 (UTC) 18:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-elack per failure of WP:RS, WP:A and WP:NOTE. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 21:02, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as that strange phenomenon, the old neologism (or more accurately, OR by way of synthesis of a kind of narrative around a slang term). tomasz. 22:43, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.