Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DayZ Survival Guide

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was already deleted via CSD A7--Salix (talk): 08:12, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DayZ Survival Guide

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not means of manuals or guides. Unsourced. unremarkable topic Mediran ^{talk to me!} 02:39, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Wikipedia is not a game instruction manual JRHorse (talk) 02:43, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as soon as possible. Unsourced entry with no such proven significant coverage anyway, including the article. Wikipedia is not a manual, guide, or essay. I think there's also that chance this could be speedy deleted per A7, maybe? TBr and ley 02:49, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This wouldn't fall under "web content" would it? JRHorse (talk) 02:55, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Technically no. A7 is for articles (on individuals, animals, organizations, and web content) with no indication of notability. The subject's about a PC game, DayZ, which doesn't qualify as web content, and notability's not the problem here, it's WP:NOT. But if there are enough !deletes, it'll likely be WP:SNOW deleted. Either way, the page will be deleted, and the quicker the better.--xanchester (t) 03:09, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a web host for game guides.--xanchester (t) 03:07, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.