Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DirectDL
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 13:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DirectDL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Rejected at AFC but moved here by creator, so here we are with a non notable topic. Theroadislong (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- hello Theroadislong. after add some new references, and link the article to the other Wikipedia language, why the article should deleted? E V I L044 (talk) 08:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. There's just no significant independent coverage of this tool from reliable sources. The Medium link is user-generated, the Gizmodo article is not actually about DirectDL, and none of the Persian- or Arabic-language sources currently cited are reliable. I also did a BEFORE-style search for further references and found nothing of value. /wiae /tlk 12:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable promotion with no significant coverage in any RS. KylieTastic (talk) 19:12, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.