Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Five generations of computing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 03:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Five generations of computing

This was PRODded with the explanation "Badly done content fork of History of computing, possible copyvio / WP:OR issues." Somebody contested the PROD on the talk page, so I'm sending it here. I say Delete per PROD nom. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. All of its content is covered far more extensively and in a more comprehensible manner in "History of computing." Aplomado - U T C 02:09, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Arnzy (Talk) 02:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Sorry Guy 05:47, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Aplomado has it covered pretty well. Darquis 06:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, rather redundant, original research, unverifiable, what's more its just a fork from History of computing. --Ter e nc e Ong 11:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Terence Ong. --Srik e it^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 14:08, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Unlike the preceding contributors, I see no overlap between History of computing and this article. The material of this article is handled in two other articles though, History of computing hardware and History of computing hardware (1960s-present). I did not check if everything here is covered in those two, but the gist of it is. Lambiam ^Talk 16:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.