Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flocations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. L Faraone 00:46, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Flocations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable company. Fails WP:COMPANY just an advertising. Tyros1972 Talk 08:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all sources appear to be routine. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete spammy and not notable per WP:CORP Sherwood10 (talk) 15:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ditto -- Y not? 16:45, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.