Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Format Proliferation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete both. No references, notability not established. CĂșchullain t/c 06:18, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Format Proliferation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) â (View log)
Appears to be an article about a neologism and may contain original research (probable presentation of a specific theory in business) or does not have enough available information for more than a dictionary entry without crossing into spam or advertisement. Also including SKU Proliferation in this discussion. Cquan (don't yell at me...) 16:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sr13 05:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep for now. The term and concept seem common enough from a quick Google search, and the article had only just been created when it was given the AFD tag. I think it should be allowed a little more time to develop. Propaniac 15:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 08:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both These are the only two contributions by the author, suggesting a conflict of interest. (Yes, there can be a profit motive in promoting this idea of Format Proliferation.) Also, it strikes me as original research. One source is not enough. YechielMan 14:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep SKU, redirect Format -- Refs abound on Google.--Mike18xx 05:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.