Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fresh concepts

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 April 4.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 21:30, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fresh concepts

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Definitely not notable. The only source is the school's website. bender235 (talk) 23:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If even the local school considers it the 18th thing you should do, there's no chance of it passing WP:GNG. tedder (talk) 20:58, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No coverage in reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 20:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable. It already has a mention at the Macalester College article, and that's all it deserves. --MelanieN (talk) 14:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.