Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GHG Vehicle Test Group
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- GHG Vehicle Test Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
GHG Vehicle Test Group is just a an identical test group. Its a definition and there is not enough content for an article. In addition, the article is unsourced as the only reference is a dead link. Beagel (talk) 18:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm tempted to tag this for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A1, as the article leaves me bewildered as to what the subject actually is. I was hoping that the blue link to test group would help but that simply redirects back to the article under discussion. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:39, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless expanded to make clear what it is about. From the merge tag on it I gather that it is something to do with US vehicle emision standards, and perhaps it might be merged. If kept it needs to be tagged "unclear" and "globalise"! Peterkingiron (talk) 14:22, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Rationale: Only three opinions and one vote have been expressed, so it may be best if more discussion is made to better reflect and establish consensus. Thanks, ~ Qwerp ♫ ♪ ツ 00:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't tell what the subject's meant to be here. Whatever it is, Googling it gives few results of any use. I thought it might have some potential under the apparent alternative title Greenhouse gas vehicle test group, but that gives nothing either. Alzarian16 (talk) 12:29, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.