Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GR8 Tech (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 03:25, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GR8 Tech

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AFD recently closed by a blocked editor (who owns a series of accounts that were used for Keep discussions). AlanRider78 (talk) 14:27, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AlanRider78 (talk) 14:27, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:35, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:36, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This plainly meets WP:GNG / WP:NCORP via significant, independent, non‐routine coverage that goes well beyond trade press. The subject (the B2B tech arm formerly known as Parimatch Tech, now GR8 Tech) has been the focus of many media, with a here for instance Forbes Ukraine with an in-depth analysis of its scale, client mix, rebrand, headcount (~1,500), and revenue shock after Ukrainian sanctions on its parent company; that article alone satisfies WP:CORPDEPTH and is neither trivial nor routine. [1] Forbes. Coverage is not limited to industry trades: The Economic Times reported the suspension of operations, sanctions and an alleged illegal activity [2]. Here is the detailed editorial Vector media article dedicated to Gr8 Tech and all perturbagtions with indudstrial analysis [3]. Here is another good coverage from the tech media talking about closing, sanctions, activity in CIS.. [4]. Here is a big read from editorial Forbes team about Gr8 Tech on how they managed to rebrand and survive in recent years [5]. More and more are available under Parimatch Tech+Gr8 Tech online search [6], [7], [8]. Jungle archer (talk) 17:30, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:58, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 15:57, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

pinging previous + current discussion participants @Gheus @Norlk @Amlikdi @Linkusyr @Chippla360 @Ramos1990 @AlanRider78 @Jungle archer Oreocooke (talk) 22:31, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I maintain that this article should be strong delete. The arguments for keep it come from the editor sockpuppetry.--AlanRider78 (talk) 14:13, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Sources are a mix of WP:TRADES, press releases and WP:ORGTRIV. I don't see any coverage in WP:SIRS that meets WP:CORPDEPTH, resulting in a failure on WP:NCORP. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: It pains me to relist this for a third time, however the arguments from the nominator nor the article creator are particularity convincing.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Brandon (talk) 07:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. The sources listed by the Keep !voter above rely entirely on information provided by the company or in interview with a company exec, therefore fails ORGIND. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:20, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORP. Google news comes up with the non-independent gaming press. LibStar (talk) 07:30, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.