Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hammer down protocol
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per WP:NEO. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 21:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hammer down protocol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original research and factually dubious. The phrase "hammer down protocol" is actually a neologism used in the recent movie Cloverfield, in which it describes a prominent plot element. Conceivably the article could be repurposed as List of movies in which a biological threat is contained by bombing, but its encyclopedic value remains unclear. In any case I don't think the question is trivial enough to prod, hence AfD. Melchoir (talk) 08:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:OR and WP:NEO. Springnuts (talk) 08:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:OR. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 11:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not even a dicdef. UrbanDictionary had info, but even that appears to be related to Cloverfield. It may sound cool, but that's about it. --- Taroaldo (talk) 18:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Carpet bombing. The terms are generally similar (the destruction of a large area to remove a threat). Inclusivedisjunction (talk) 13:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd actually be more comfortable with a redirect to Cloverfield than to a real-life topic. Melchoir (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. Would not be appropriate to redirect to Carpet bombing. --- Taroaldo (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd actually be more comfortable with a redirect to Cloverfield than to a real-life topic. Melchoir (talk) 17:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not reliably sourced, and redirect. WillOakland (talk) 02:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.