Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hexateronic numbers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 13:45, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hexateronic numbers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Apparently made-up term: see User talk:A legend#Hexatope numbers. No ghits for either "hexateronic numbers", "hexatope numbers", or "hexateron numbers" (that User:4, the prod contester, claims without evidence appears in the literature.) Sławomir Biały (talk) 15:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Just added no ref tag to article. --MWOAP (talk) 20:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unpublished original work of the author. Jennifer500 (talk) 23:01, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: This is basically a clone of Pentatope number. It is example of copy and paste type articles which have dubious notability at best. Creating an article by by copying another one is plagiarism and making the changes needed to make it about a marginally different subject is original research if there are no independent sources. Even if the subject were notable, the article would need a complete rewrite to fix these issues.--RDBury (talk) 14:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. From the talk page discussion, it seems to me like the user just made it up. Insorak ♫ talk 20:28, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Without any references (and a quick google only finds this page) it's OR.--John Blackburne (words ‡ deeds) 09:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.