Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indirect self-reference
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Indirect self-reference (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced. Fails WP:DICDEF.4meter4 (talk) 13:42, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Philosophy. Shellwood (talk) 15:31, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- Merge to self-reference. I've reduced the uncited fluff, expanded what's left a bit, and added cites. There is certainly more than just a dicdef here. I propose this should be merged into the self-reference article as a section. — The Anome (talk) 15:49, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- I'm going to agree with merge here. The content can be mostly saved. Just as a reference point, SEP has no article for indirect self-reference but does discuss it as part of the broader article Self-Reference and Paradox; that's probably a pretty good model for what we should do here. Caleb Stanford (talk) 18:30, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
- Comment as the nominator I support a merge to self-reference per the discussion above.4meter4 (talk) 19:19, 5 December 2025 (UTC)