Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Initial volume of distribution

Initial volume of distribution

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Initial volume of distribution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced since 2006. Given that this is potentially dangerous content if it’s not accurate in the real world (ie drug formulas going wrong) I don’t think we should be housing this type of content if it’s not verified.4meter4 (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

• Comment Multiple good-quality academic sources are readily available[1] Elemimele (talk) 16:01, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

• Question Any particular reason to cover this separately from Volume of distribution? If there isn't, merging/redirecting there seems like the most appropriate course of action. TompaDompa (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2025 (UTC)