Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logicle Secretary
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Logicle Secretary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable search software. The last time I checked, this had ten Google hits, and simply nothing at all that could support inclusion. My PROD was contested, so here we are. Glenfarclas (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 21:48, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 03:38, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - does not appear to satisfy any notability guidelines to merit inclusion. Cocytus [»talk«] 04:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.