Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic Tulip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs): "G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page." NAC — Glenfarclas (talk) 05:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Magic Tulip

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipeida is not for things you make up one day. It is also not a webhost. Article creator has identified herself as a 11 year old girl, so there is some possible WP:CHILD issues here as well. —Farix (t | c) 00:53, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Farix. No sources to establish the notability. JJ98 (Talk) 01:42, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:GNG. It really doesn't have to be more complicated than that, but still, I'd like to see where the article creator identified her age. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 01:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- [1] Though I don't expect that to save live for very long as it will likely be oversighted in accordance with Wikipedia's child protection policies. —Farix (t | c) 02:02, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks. I'd contact an oversighter if I were you. Guoguo12 --Talk-- 02:20, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable topic as shown above. Glenfarclas (talk) 02:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.