Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maglide
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Tawker 05:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Promotional (history appears to show that the inventor created the article [1]). No evidence of notability or importance. Google test does not help. Edcolins 15:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Per nom, i.e. me. --Edcolins 15:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Inventor did not create article. Google is catching up. Invention is patented in US and UK with application for WO. Invention is unique and technically sound as per article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.59.104 (talk • contribs) 15:44, 1 May 2006
- Speedy Delete per A7, no assertion of notability. 216.140.95.130 18:12, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete An invention that is not actually being used is not notable. (The pictures on the website are amusing, though.) Fan1967 18:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There are many inventions which have not as yet fully come to market. In additional to the practical applications for which the invention can be utilized the use of a tuned generator to act as a retarder is worthy of inclusion— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.59.104 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 1 May 2006 8
- Comment Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. What may be done with this invention, or the potential of the invention, is irrelevant. Inventions which have not yet come to market are not notable. Fan1967 18:50, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.