Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Hugunin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 22:44, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Hugunin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not assert notability with independent sources, which I failed to find with a quick Google. There is also potentially a conflict of interest as the creator is a co-author of a book along with the subject. wctaiwan (talk) 08:26, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 08:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 08:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ——Bagumba (talk) 10:18, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ——Bagumba (talk) 10:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable. A similar version was speedied before as A7. Hairhorn (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable as an WP:AUTHOR as sources do not exist that are independent of the subject that establish his expertise as a writer. The current article relies frequently on original research and self published sources. It is possible someone can demonstrate notability based on WP:POLITICIAN. However, most of sources on Google are subscription only and I cannot determine if it goes beyond WP:ROUTINE coverage to determine if notability can be established by WP:POLITICIAN. Some quotations from identified sources could help to verify any notability claims. With the noted conflict of interest concerns, please ensure sources are reliable —Bagumba (talk) 18:56, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.