Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matulchandra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Stifle (talk) 11:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Matulchandra

The page contains nothing but badly romanised Sanskrit. (I think, I can't even tell!) The author is also up for deletion as non-notable and potentially non-existent. ناهد^𒀭(^dAnāhita) ^𒅴 07:43, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - has this been up for the requisite two weeks on pages needing translation? - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:17, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- No, because it is in a highly variable and insufficient romanisation, without regard for vowel length or the many sounds present in Sanskrit, plus it's, you know, romanised. There is no translation or cite offered. I don't think it is worthy of being posted there, it's a waste of someone's time if we can't find the name of the poem anywhere in the first place... Should I post it there anyway? ناهد^𒀭(^dAnāhita) ^𒅴 15:54, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article is about a poem, and the part that says so is in plain English. This said, there is no notability assertion to be found either on Wikipedia or on Google. The part in a foreign language should go to Wikiquote if the article should be kept. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:56, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.