Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Overby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Overby

The speedy that I put on the article was declined. I put a speedy tag on it because it looks like a hoax and because I couldn't find any sources. The admin that declined it said that not having any hits does not show that it is a hoax. In this case, I think that it does because the article says that Michael Overby was a voice actor in many films and won an award many times. It is very strange that I couldn't find any sources for someone this notable. Schuym1 (talk) 23:45, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He's not in the IMDB. I know it's not a reliable source, but you'd think an actor with that many credits would have something. He's also not listed among the ADDY award winners since 1992, but then those are given to ad agencies, not actors. Rklear (talk) 00:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Searching Lexis Nexis for paper sources with the combos ("michael overby" "voice actor"), ("michael overby" "voice"), and ("michael overby" "film") only yielded a handful of unrelated links and the very first didn't get anything. This is unverifiable with both web and paper sources. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - after a bit of searching, this article fails verifiability in spectacular fashion. -- Whpq (talk) 17:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep per some found information.--Judo112 (talk) 12:44, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What information was found? There are no references in the article. None of the editors contributing to this AFD discussion have found any information, including you. -- Whpq (talk) 13:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Could not find any reliable sources, so fails WP:RS --Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 23:42, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.