Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moment.js
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar ⨹ 16:12, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- Moment.js (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails wp:GNG. Nor reliable independent sources that discuss the subject. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:38, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 02:36, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: @Vanjagenije:: What about this? Or this? ----Mr. Guye (talk) 20:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (witter) @ 21:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (witter) @ 21:37, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Unfortunately, I don't think that tutorials qualify as establishing notability. WP:NSOFT says that software may be notable if it "is discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field". Tutorials do not make any claims about the software's significance. ~ Boomur [☎] 05:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 00:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 00:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- delete – not enough for general notability; unless anyone can find some coverage but there's nothing that I can find better than what's in the article.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 04:38, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.