Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onion-Shell Reality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Onion-Shell Reality

Undergrad "philosophy," unsourced and probable COI. In original version of article, there was a disclaimer that missing were "proper academic references, all of which I plan on contributing in the near future." When I opened conversation with creating editor on his talk page, they responded [[1]] with "what I put there will be saved for posterity, correct? Now I have more time to work on my thesis so it will be more likely to be published." Wikipedia isn't a place to put your ideas. Pure WP:OR Movingboxes (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the above (i.e. non-notable, non-verifiable, COI, etc}.Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:42, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~~Trolls~~Ogres are like onions... AlexTiefling (talk) 11:03, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 13:25, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. non-notable OR by a college student. RJC ^{Talk Contribs} 16:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. No viable sourcing visible. GRBerry 15:32, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, no reliable sources, original "research", etc... Klausness (talk) 16:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.