Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontogenetic art
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ontogenetic art (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
COI article promoting a "theory " of art created by a performance artist (who also happens to be the page author) WuhWuzDat 15:45, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- Danger (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The references on the page are for the biological concept rather than this synthetic concept for which no references are obvious. AllyD (talk) 00:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and do not merge and redirect to artist's article (which is itself of dubious notability). Only reference does not mention article subject, no hit at google scholar, so does not even merit a merge, since no sources. Self created self advert. PPdd (talk) 05:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.