Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open Conference Systems
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn, article opened at WP:RFD (non admin closure). Dustitalk to me 17:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Open Conference Systems (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Odd one, this. The subject of the article is a non-notable software product. I prodded it but another editor insisted on redirecting it to a more general article. Is it notable? Clearly not. So why keep it at all? Original prod is here.
Nomination withdrawn - in the light of the comments below I've changed it to an RfD.andy (talk) 22:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I think, since it was the redirect version that was AfDed, that this belongs at WP:Redirects for discussion. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 23:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe so. I AfDed it because the purpose of the redirect was clearly to contest the prod. andy (talk) 23:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't say that for sure- they could have contested the PROD without changing the article, by simply removing the tag. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 23:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe so. I AfDed it because the purpose of the redirect was clearly to contest the prod. andy (talk) 23:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural speedy keep and reopen at RfD Thinboy00 @024, i.e. 23:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.