Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opera Dragonfly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 03:35, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Opera Dragonfly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. asenine t/c\r (fc: f2abr04) 11:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe you wanna delete this Opera Dragonfly entry, BUT, this product is sure to be released. This product is documented by Opera developpers on several official blog. This entry will be created again, as soon as it will be released in the forthcoming days. (3 days from now on) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.200.209.241 (talk) 22:25, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, obviously. Deb (talk) 11:55, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 07:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:CRYSTAL. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 08:57, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, even if there was anything noteworthy about the forthcoming software it is written as a marketing release, i.e. '...there were many rumours what it would be' PRasmussen (talk) 10:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Stifle (talk) 19:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:14, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.