Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Predrag Bambic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, per improvements made. Non-admin closure. TN‑X-Man 15:16, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Predrag Bambic

Non-notable producer, no outside refs, mostly self-published bios on google, nothing of note on google news, mostly just a list of his films. MBisanz ^talk 02:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per reasons in the nom. No assertion of notability.Keep per the improvements made to the article. EconomicsGuy (talk) 10:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.. Guess that's a keep now. Equendil Talk 21:34, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability established per Rory Peck Trust Award 1999, New york Times review 1, Los Angeles Times review, Montage filmsite, cfsindia.org (entry #147), New York Times review 2, Croatia.org, etc. Notability is not temporary. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:34, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll see what I can do to make it encyclopdic. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Step 1: Began cleanup and wikification per MOS. Lots more to do. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- step 2 Sourced, tweaked, added reviews of man and his films. Further wikified. Anyone read Croatian? Gotta respect a guy trying to build a film career while his country is in turmoil... documenting that same turmoil. Woah. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:06, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- step 3 Added additional sources. Finished 99% of the sourcing. Added additional EL's. Found a picture of Bambic over at sh.wikipedia.org. Can we get a copy for this article? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Change to keep Looks like there were some worthwhile sources. MBisanz ^talk 13:06, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.