Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Q dot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I've tried quite hard to source the charting / airplay for the "Hotter Than A Furnace" single, and I've come up with nothing bar one radio station's airplay list which returns a 403 error. This might be on the borderlines of notability, and no problem with recreating it if WP:V and WP:MUSIC can be overcome. Black Kite 23:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Q dot

I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:MUSIC. Schuym1 (talk) 10:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 10:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No comment as to this article, but if deleted should be redirected to cue mark, which is also known as a cue dot hence this being a reasonable search term. JulesH (talk) 13:05, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, because this rapper has not met any of the requirements in WP:MUSICBIO. Tavix (talk) 01:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: #3 hot urban single in radiowave music chart appears to indicate notability. It's either charting hit or indication of significant radio airtime as per http://www.radiowavemonitor.com Can anyone verify it's the case? - Mgm|^(talk) 11:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if the charting can be verified. Bearian (talk) 17:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no reliable 3rd party verification. JamesBurns (talk) 05:08, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.