Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Gupta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit Gupta

Fails WP:N. Subject ran a group blog, which received some incidental media coverage following the Indian Ocean tsunami in 2004, but even that project is long defunct. Note: Main contributor to the article, User:Fadereu, says he is Rohit Gupta. Abecedare (talk) 05:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: self-advertisement (checked earlier version of User:Fadereu's userpage), non-notable.--GDibyendu (talk) 10:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Abecedare (talk) 07:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Joe the Plumber also received incidental media coverage. I don't see why this scenario is different. ScienceApe (talk) 18:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is not Joe the Plumber. The article is uninformative and unreferenced; Google news has tons of hits for "Rohit Gupta," but unfortunately there's dozens of em. Our Gupta doesn't appear until hit 31, an article that establishes that he was not the main man in this SEA-EAT blog--he was one of the bloggers, one of 50 only days after the tsunami. Drmies (talk) 03:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per WP:BIO. Schuym1 (talk) 01:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable. IceCreamEmpress (talk) 02:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Joe the little man on the horse. JBsupreme (talk) 07:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.