Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SAS Flight 910
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:59, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- SAS Flight 910 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable incident. A plane diverts, no injuries, blah...blah...blah. Take your choice WP:AIRCRASH, WP:NOTNEWS, that the article is totally unreferenced, or that it may be the work of one of Ryan Kirkpatrick's socks. ...William 23:16, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. ...William 23:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. ...William 23:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. ...William 23:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable for any reason. Good sensible reaction to a minor in-flight emergency, nothing more.Petebutt (talk) 19:19, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Unlikely to be Fitzpatrick because the spelling is too good.Petebutt (talk) 01:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete There is nothing notable about this incident, just because something happened on a plane doesn't make it automatically notable. JoeGazz84 ♦ 19:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Monumentally non-notable incident.Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 22:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I've added 2 references, but don't have strong enough opinion if it meets WP:N or not. Ipsign (talk) 10:04, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.